Uh-oh. Ever heard the story about President Franklin Roosevelt using former crime boss Al Capone's armored car, which reportedly had been seized by the Internal Revenue Service upon Capone's conviction, to move around Washington when security concerns became a big issue as World War II began? The History Insider noted this supposedly well-documented item in a December 2011 entry, but new research suggests that the story is only that -- a story. In other words, it's bogus. False. Myth.
The car in question -- a 1928 Cadillac town car -- is being sold this weekend through RM Auctions. And research noted by RM suggests that the U.S. government never possessed the car, and might not have known that it existed. Instead, it appears that one of Capone's associates sold it in 1932 to a couple who worked for a traveling carnival. Their plan to make money by showing the car to through the carnival never paid off, and they sold it about a year later to someone else, who took it to England, where it was displayed. The car was sold and resold privately several times, and ended up back in the U.S.by the mid-1960s, where it's been since.
Think you might want to bid on it this weekend? That'll set you back an estimated $300,000 to $500,000, according to the auction house's announcement.
Saturday, July 28, 2012
Saturday, July 21, 2012
The troubled history of the Washington Monument
Stone of a slightly different shade completes the upper two-thirds of the Washington Monument. |
Congress authorized a monument to George Washington soon after his death in 1799, but nothing came of it until 1832, when a group of private citizens established the Washington National Monument Society. They raised funds for the project and held a design competition for it in 1836. The winner was well-known and highly recognized architect Robert Mills. His design included an obelisk (a tall, four-sided column) with a nearly flat top, surrounded with columns at its base, enclosing statues of 30 other Revolutionary War heroes. Although the $1 million cost was well beyond what the Society had collected, work was begun on the obelisk, in hopes that its construction would spur more people to donate money to the project.
Only some elements of the Washington Monument's original design were ultimately put in place. |
Construction began in 1848 and continued until 1854, when private funding became exhausted, leaving the obelisk somewhat less than one-third completed. Congress appropriated $200,000 to the effort in 1855, but quickly rescinded the money after members of the Know-Nothing organization engineered a takeover of the Monument Society at about the same time. Ultimately, the Know Nothing-led Monument Society funded only a bit of more work, which was of such low quality that it was later replaced. By 1858, leadership of the Society returned to people without the divisive beliefs of the Know-Nothings, but interest in completing the monument fell victim to the political and other pressures that led to the outbreak of the Civil War only a few years later.
The Washington Monument remained an unattractive, unfinished stub of stone for about 25 years. |
After the Civil War, interest in the monument renewed, but it wasn’t until 1876 that Congress again appropriated money – again, $200,000 – for the effort. Before work began, questions arose about design of the monument. Some people wanted to proceed with the original Mills plan from 1836, but others sought or submitted new plans. While these new designs were under consideration, Congress in 1879 ordered work to continue on the obelisk, and ultimately no additional structures were added. The final two-thirds or more of the obelisk, taking it to a height of just over 555 feet, were completed in December 1884 – but with stones from a different quarry than when the lower part of the structure was put in place some 25 years earlier. At first, the newer stones appeared to match the color of the original stones. But over time, they have weathered differently, producing the different shade we see today.
Since it was
completed, the Washington Monument has been closed to the public several times
for routine maintenance or restoration. A 2011 earthquake caused significant
damage, and the monument was closed again in July 2012 for repairs. Reopening
is expected in 2014.
Saturday, July 14, 2012
Ben Franklin's son ... a Royal Governor and British loyalist
American
patriot Ben Franklin did his best to ensure the success of his son in colonial
America, but regretted it when the son became too successful and dedicated to meeting his professional
responsibilities … leading to an estrangement that never reconciled between the
father and son.
William Franklin |
Born
illegitimately to a mother who is unknown to history, William Franklin grew up
with his father and a stepmother, Ben Franklin’s common-law wife Deborah. The
stepmother/stepson relationship tended to be strained.
As William
became a young adult, his father arranged for him to study law under a
respected Philadelphia attorney. And after Ben was appointed deputy postmaster
for pre-revolutionary America in 1751, he appointed William as postmaster of
Philadelphia, a post that the elder Franklin held previously. Father and son
appeared to be very close during this stage of their lives, not only in the
professional world, but personally as well, with William serving as Ben’s only
assistant for his famous kite experiment. Both men jointly speculated in
acquiring western lands, too, believing strongly in their growing value as the
colonies expanded.
William
joined his dad on a trip to England in 1757. Ben had been appointed by the
Pennsylvania Assembly to approach the British government with concerns about
the Penn family’s control of the colony as its “proprietors.” At the time, the
Assembly could pass its own laws, but the Penn family, which technically owned
the colony based on the original land charter given to it by the British king more
than 75 years earlier, had final say on any such action by the Assembly. That
governance structure produced a considerable amount of conflict in the rapidly
growing colony. During his visit to England, Ben was unsuccessful in his
efforts to loosen the proprietors’ control.
But Ben –
and William – did enjoy another success that surprised almost everyone. Thanks to the elder Franklin’s connections
with the British prime minister, Britain’s newly crowned George III appointed
William to be the Royal Governor of New Jersey. William took the position
seriously and never wavered in performing his responsibilities. He remained a dutiful
British loyalist even as his father and others moved toward revolution during
the late 1760s and early 1770s. William and Ben grew further and further apart
during those years.
“Away from his father, [William] had grown
into a man of his own, as convinced of the correctness of his principles as his
father was of his principles, and as stubborn in defending them,” wrote H.
W. Brands in his 2000 book The First American: The Life and Times of Benjamin Franklin. “The apple had fallen close to the tree in regard of character,
if not of politics.”
As hostilities between the colonists and British broke out and continued for years, colonial militiamen put William Franklin under house arrest in 1776. A few months later, he was seized and taken to Connecticut, where he remained under control of Governor Jonathan Trumbull. In contrast to William, Trumbull supported the American cause despite his appointment to his position by the British crown.
As hostilities between the colonists and British broke out and continued for years, colonial militiamen put William Franklin under house arrest in 1776. A few months later, he was seized and taken to Connecticut, where he remained under control of Governor Jonathan Trumbull. In contrast to William, Trumbull supported the American cause despite his appointment to his position by the British crown.
Released as
part of a prisoner exchange in 1778, William lived among other loyalists in New
York. He then went to England about 1782, never to return to America. In 1784,
William wrote to his father, who was nearing the end of a stint as the American
ambassador to France, that he wished to “revive
that affectionate intercourse and connexion which till the commencement of the
last troubles had been the pride and happiness of my life.”
On his way
back to America, Ben agreed to meet with William when he passed through England.
Ultimately, it became a business meeting to tie up legal and financial issues
involving land William owned in America and debts that he owed to his father. A
complicating issue was the presence of Temple Franklin, William’s own
illegitimate son (fathered prior to his marriage, also with a mother unknown to
history), who Ben had taken in and raised, although William later acknowledged
Temple as his own.
“The meeting of the three generations
occurred under inauspicious circumstances,” wrote Brands in his Ben
Franklin biography. “[Ben] Franklin’s
guests were coming and going … the three had scarce time and less privacy for
the sort of soul-searching a genuine reunion required. Doubtless Franklin
preferred it this way. Scars had formed over wounds he felt at what he
considered his son’s betrayal; better not to reopen them.”
“William found the encounter acutely
distressing,” added Brands. “His
hopes for reconciliation were dashed, his ties to his homeland severed.”
Saturday, July 7, 2012
The fascinating fate of the Bounty's mutineers ...
The story of
the mutiny on the British ship Bounty
in 1789 doesn’t end with the near-miraculous voyage to safety of Lieutenant William Bligh and the men loyal to him after mutineers set them adrift in a
small boat. The fates of the mutineers are fascinating too.
After the
mutiny, 27 men remained on the Bounty.
A small number of them had been loyal to Bligh, but were either kept on the
larger ship because their skills were needed or there was no room to put them
into the smaller craft with the captain. Still others still on the Bounty hadn’t been aligned with the
mutineers, but took no action to help Bligh. So the crew manning the troubled
ship wasn’t a tremendously harmonious group.
Fletcher
Christian, leader of the mutineers, first took the Bounty to the island of Tubuai, about 350 miles south of Tahiti.
But within a week, the Bounty sailed
to Tahiti, remembered fondly by the crew as a paradise, for food. They returned
to Tubuai with some Tahitian women and men, and spent three months trying to
establish a settlement there. But arguments, especially over women, and other
differences doomed that endeavor. The Bounty
and its crew and the Tahitians returned to Tahiti once again. There, the crew
split, with some taking up life on the island while Christian and the eight
sailors most closely aligned with him left for the high seas on the Bounty. With them were nine Tahitian women, six
Tahitian men, and one Tahitian child.
Upon finding
lonely and small Pitcairn Island at a different place than indicated on sea
charts, the mutineers decided to settle there – and ensured it by running the Bounty aground, salvaging supplies and
equipment from her, and burning the ship.
No one in
the rest of the world knew what became of the Bounty and the mutineers who sailed with her on that final voyage until
1808, when an American ship named the Topaz
stumbled across Pitcairn’s Island and noticed signs of habitation. Further
exploration by the Americans revealed a settlement led by one Alexander Smith
(whose real name was John Adams), the sole surviving mutineer, who told the
visitors of the others’ fate.
“The colony … prospered, although two of the
mutineers died in the first two years, one of ‘sickness,’ one by jumping off
the towering rocks in a fit of insanity,” wrote Caroline Alexander, author
of the 2003 book The Bounty: The True Story of the Mutiny on the Bounty, in summarizing Smith’s account. “Four or five years later, six of the seven
remaining mutineers, including Fletcher Christian, were killed in the night by
their ‘Otaheite [Tahitian] servants,’ who had risen against them. Only
[mutineer] Alexander Smith had been left alive, although badly wounded. The [Tahitian]
widows of the mutineers then in turn killed their Tahitian kinsmen in revenge,
and so Smith had been left with all the women, and their various offspring.”
Of course, there’s no good way to verify Smith’s account, but no good reason to
doubt the gist of it either – although he reportedly offered conflicting details
in later retellings of his story.
The captain
of the Topaz reported his find to
British authorities, but Britain didn’t pursue it. And a when couple of British
ships happened up the Pitcairn Island colony in 1814, they had no clue that it
had been discovered years earlier. This
re-discovery brought much attention, however, and John Adams [aka Alexander
Smith] was granted amnesty in 1825. Pitcairn and surrounding islands were made
part of the British Empire in 1838.
But many of the
mutineers who remained on Tahiti when the Bounty
took its last voyage to Pitcairn weren’t as fortunate as Adams/Smith. After
Bligh returned to England and reported the mutiny, British authorities sent
another ship – the Pandora – to hunt
down them down. Fourteen former Bounty crewmen were found on Tahiti, arrested,
and placed in a cage on the Pandora’s
deck. A search for the other mutineers on neighboring islands proved fruitless,
so the Pandora set sail back to
England. Tragedy struck when the ship ran aground and sank with the loss of 31
crewmen and four of the prisoners.
When the ten
surviving prisoners finally arrived back in England, they were court martialed.
Three were found guilty and hanged, three were found guilty but pardoned, and
four were acquitted.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)